Mendrs blog tour 2012

Friday, August 3, 2012

A few weeks ago, Simon and I trekked up the M6 to the amazing Mendrs symposium in the Lake District. We had a fantastic time, catching up with friends and making new ones!

I gave a talk about my PhD research, and in particular how the re-knitting treatments I’m developing could be seen as a sort of ‘emotional mending’. I’ve put the abstract here, and I think a recording of all the presentations will be available on the Mendrs site soon.

This post is part of the Mendrs blog tour – conceived as a way of continuing the energy and interest generated at the event, and nurturing the sense of community we created. For this post, I wanted to reflect on my own experiences, and share the thoughts that I have when I’m mending clothes.

The pictures above show some of my recent mending exploits:

  • Simon’s (very) vintage pea coat, which was in great condition when he bought it in San Francisco 7 years ago, is becoming an ongoing mending project for me. On previous occasions I have fixed the lining, patched the pocket bags, and bound the disintegrating cuffs. On my last mission, I completely replaced the pocket bags, which required a journey into the depths of a very well-constructed garment, and bound the fraying buttonholes.

  • Inspired by my work on Simon’s coat, I replaced the entire lining of my vintage llama coat, which I must have had for 15 years. It was in rags, a disgrace – I dreaded taking my coat off! At the same time, I replaced the pocket bags with lovely strong drill, rather than the existing silly lining fabric which snags and splits and is useless for pockets.

  • Simon and I formed a mini production line to renovate his mountain of jeans, which required all manner of mending. He assessed condition, cut and pinned patches; I sewed. He now has a mountain of fixed jeans, but still wears the same pair for weeks at a time.

  • My white mac has been languishing in the mending pile for a couple of years, waiting for me to somehow deal with a number of rather obtrusive pen stains, which had mysteriously appeared on the placket. Prompted to act by the need to be smart on my sister’s potentially rainy wedding day, I created a line of foundation stitches and then added crochet trim to cover the stains and co-ordinate with the buttons. I’m too scruffy to avoid more stains in future, but I think now that I’ve ‘opened’ this piece, I’ll feel quite positive about adding more embellishments.

  • At Mendrs, I patched up my large stuffed frog, who was acquired from the Brussels flea market and underwent structural damage in the wash. I felt bad about having spoiled him, but now feel warm and fuzzy when I see his polka dot patches.

It’s nice to share my mending – in the past, it’s been a rather ‘backstage’ activity for me, but I’m beginning to see it in a different light.

I have always tended to think of mending as a chore, which is never complete. My mending box (boxes, actually) are a rather stagnant area. Items are put there, full of good intentions, and rediscovered with a sense of horror years later – especially if only a button was needed. Perhaps my lack of passion for mending is because I have preferred to make something new, to be able to follow an idea on a journey from an image in my mind to material reality.

There’s loads of evidence that making is good for you – the physical hands-on activity, the joy of interacting with materials, the way it connects you with others, the satisfaction of seeing something grow and take shape, and the opportunity it gives you to express yourself and your identity. I talk to lots of amateur knitters about these benefits at workshops – but we also talk about the frustrations of making, and the reasons why more people don’t make things for themselves to wear.

One of the key issues of making something from scratch is, I think, the overwhelming number of choices you have to make: colour, material, shape, pattern, size… plus that niggling concern that it won’t turn out quite as you intended. Of course, you can use a pattern – but that still involves lots of choices, and often the feeling that you haven’t got quite what you wanted. While I generally encourage people to feel confident in experimenting, I have to admit that too much choice can just be paralysing. I’m a trained designer, yet like everyone else I have piles of beautiful fabric that I can’t quite figure out what to do with.

When it comes to making non-knitted clothes I am like anyone else, an amateur. Though I have good sewing skills, gained from my fashion degree, I ‘use up’ my creative juices on Keep & Share and don’t have the energy for sewing garments from scratch that I once had.

In my recent activities – perhaps because of the work I’ve been doing with existing garments, and the conversations I’ve had about mending with Tom of Holland and others – I’ve found that mending is a really rewarding type of making, which overcomes the paralysis of choice.

When you approach a garment that needs mending, the challenge is already framed; the piece itself is telling you what to do, or at least what the problem is. When I fixed the pockets of Simon’s coat, I didn’t have to think about what to make. I knew that the pockets needed patching, or replacing, and could then focus on the satisfying, and creative, task of figuring out how to do that. Although I didn't have a pattern or instructions, by observing the garment I could figure out how it was made. When I re-lined my coat, I carefully took apart the old lining and used it as a pattern for the new one. I’ve discovered the construction secrets of some old, beautifully made, pieces – and added in some of my own. As I deconstruct and reconstruct, I learn about the garments in my wardrobe and create a stronger connection with them. Of course, I also get the warm glow of treasuring materials, and keeping something in use.

I don’t have a lot of time for personal making – there are always more urgent work-related making tasks to be done – but when I do a good mend, I get a good return on my time investment. When I put a new lining in my coat, I effectively gained a new coat, because it had become pretty much unwearable. Plus, if you mend something that you have worn to pieces, you know that the effort will be worth it. When I buy or make something new, I never quite know whether it will become a best friend, or sink to the back of the wardrobe.

I reckon that the satisfaction of making depends to some extent on framing: if you can frame your mending as a creative act, and give yourself enough time and the right tools and materials, it will be fulfilling. Like any other task, if the framing is different, it can feel like drudgery, or at least a chore. Perhaps any type of making can be a ‘flow’ activity, which Csikszentmihalyi describes as being between boredom and anxiety. Having got my head into the right space for mending, I'll be approaching my mending box with anticipation, rather than trepidation, from now on.

PS If you’re thinking that I’m doing a lot of mending for Simon, I should point out that he does the vast majority of the cooking and washing chez Holroyd – activities that are flow for him, drudgery for me :)

 

To read more about mending, check out the other posts on the Mendrs blog tour:

Tour Date

Blogger

URL

Tour Taster

Clare Thomas

http://cleaningbeaches.wordpress.com/2012/07/07/mending-objects-mending-...

Tour Taster

Flowering Elbow

http://www.floweringelbow.org/2012/invent/musings-on-mending-mendrs/

20/07/2012

Mend*RS

http://mendrs.net

25/07/2012

GUTmag

www.gutmag.eu

27/072012

Futuremenders

http://futuremenders.com

03/08/2012

Keep & Share

http://www.keepandshare.co.uk/blog

10/08/2012

Venerable Clothing

http://venerableclothing.blogspot.co.uk

17/08/2012

tomofholland

http://tomofholland.com

24/08/2012

bridgetharvey

http://bridgetharvey.blogspot.co.uk

31/08/2012

textilelives

http://textilelives.co.uk (NOT LIVE YET)

07/09/2012

KnittedGeographies

http://knittedgeographies.wordpress.com

14/09/2012

lizparker

http://lizparker.org

21/09/2012

The Bunny Pile

http://thebunnypile.wordpress.com

28/09/2012

Unstructured Material

http://www.unstructuredmaterial.blogspot.co.uk

05/10/2012

The Blogging Phenotype

http://blog.spinningkid.info

12/10/2012

Logo Removal Service

http://www.logoremovalservice.com/news-log-etc/

19/10/2012

Caitlin DeSilvey and Steve Bond

http://smallisbeautifulproject.blogspot.co.uk

26/10/2012

Stitched Up

http://www.stitchedupuk.co.uk

 

Category:

Tags:

The Knitting Circle

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

It feels good to be blogging again after a hiatus caused by the intensive work required to get the new website up and running.

I wanted to write a little about the Knitting Circle activity I’ve been running as part of the Keep & Share Knitting Tent at festivals this summer, aided by Simon and a lovely team of volunteers: Sarah, Richmal, Cybèle, Tim, Amy, Lily, Kate, Steph and Deb (aka my mum). In the last few weeks we’ve been back to Latitude, and to the lovely Port Eliot for the first time.

This is the fourth year of the knitting tent and my communal knitting projects. Each year I try to develop the project design, to improve the experience (both for those taking part and logistically, for us running it) and to explore emerging ideas. Overall, I’m trying to create an engaging and accessible activity that will provide an enjoyable experience of knitting, and which will embrace knitters of all abilities, from absolute beginners to experts. Hopefully, the idea seems simple to those taking part – though, as always, to design something simple requires a lot of thought and preparation behind the scenes.

Earlier this year I heard David Gauntlett describe his eight principles for building platforms for creativity, and although they were based on the creation of digital platforms, I found that they mirrored the approach of my communal knitting activities. Most of the ideas have been pretty much at the heart of my thinking since my first projects, some unconsciously, some – like set no limits on participation and support storytelling – more consciously. Being aware of them allowed me to think about how to amplify these qualities in this year’s project.

Last year, the project was to knit ribbons, in a game of knitting consequences. People were asked to knit a narrow strip; when they finished, they left the knitting on the needles and attached a tag with a message for the next knitter. At first, we had to actively encourage people to leave a message on a tag. However, as the ribbons grew, and the knitters could see the ‘game’, the activity became more autonomous.

I wanted to develop this quality for this year’s project – to create a project where not only the tagging, but the whole principle, was easily discernable through observation, rather than explanation.

The other idea I wanted to explore was that of connection. I have recently run workshops at a few Craft Club training sessions, facilitating a mini communal knitting activity. Wanting to encourage the knitters to not worry about what they are knitting (important qualities when knitting with kids, in my opinion), I guided the group in knitting narrow strips, which started off as individual pieces but gradually became joined together. I loved seeing how, as the knitting became connected, the knitters had to physically move closer together, and the conversation became more informal and intimate. It was like the intangible experience of connection at a knitting circle, made visible.

I decided to build on this idea for the 2012 knitting activity: the Knitting Circle. I machine knitted 24 metres of narrow-width fabric, and grafted it closed to create a continuous loop (albeit with an unintended knot!). The circle was suspended at waist height on steel fencing pins, to create a free-standing structure. At many points around the circle, we picked up stitches and knitted, so that new strands were growing off the original one. Each set of knitting-in-progress was connected to the circle, and tied in a stripy plastic bag – so those who wanted to take part had a sort of lucky dip in terms of what they found inside. As the knitting grew long enough, we would join it back onto the circle to create additional loops which, in turn, could be knitted off.

Happily, the project has been a resounding success – we had loads of people taking part at both festivals. Lots of people worked out the ‘game’, and joined in without even needing to read the concise instructions I’d put up. The knitting-in-progress was ready at hand for teaching beginners, and we had french-knitting-in-progress and crochet-in-progress attached too, so everyone could be connected to the same structure. As the festivals progressed, the circle became gradually more complex and elaborate. It ebbed and flowed - at times, full of people; at others, empty, with the hanging bags and needles both showing previous activity and inviting interaction. The project became almost autonomous at times - our favourite moment was around 11.30 on the Saturday evening at Latitude, after the headline act had finished, when we looked around and found that the previously empty circle had quietly filled up with late-night knitters.

What I love about the festival knitting activities is the connection between people, the mingling and cross-pollination of conversation, and the sharing of skills and experiences. Like with the Craft Club activity, the physical material of the Knitting Circle both visibly represented these connections, and – hopefully – encouraged them. The configuration of the circle choreographed the spatial organisation of those taking part, combining them as a single (at times, very cosy!) group.

At each communal knitting project, I like to ask people to share their thoughts on tags attached to the knitting. This year, I connected this request with my PhD research: ‘share your feelings about wearing homemade clothes’. I got loads of great responses, and hope to gather more when we take the Knitting Tent and the Knitting Circle to End of the Road in September. I’ll write another post about those responses soon!

Category:

Remixing the fashion commons

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

This is a guest post that I wrote for the blog of Digital Transformations, a research network exploring digital transformations in the creative relationships between cultural and media organisations and their users. It outlines my thoughts after attending the second of a series of academic workshops on this subject.

At Friday’s workshop the discussion touched on fashion’s approach to intellectual property and how it is different to that of other cultural sectors. (For instance, it was mentioned that in a Guardian webchat the previous evening, Clay Shirky had mentioned that there is no copyright in fashion, but that this had not deterred fashion designers from producing creative designs).

This is an interest of mine: the theoretical part of my PhD on fashion, making and well-being hangs on the idea of fashion being a commons, or a shared cultural resource. I describe the fashion commons as consisting of the huge diversity of dress and garment styles, shapes, fabrics and details from different geographical areas and historical periods. Fashion depends on this broad, varied, vibrant resource, because new fashions involve existing styles revisited, recombined or recontextualised. In ‘Material Culture in the Social World’, Tim Dant describes how fashion ‘acts as a living museum’ and ‘plays promiscuously with the past’, reviving elements from the commons and layering them with new meanings.

The fashion industry is only able to use this commons because of the minimal legal protections that exist for its creative design. The industry actively protects its trademarks, such as brand names and logos, but the design of garments cannot be ‘owned’. In their paper on fashion and IP in the USA, Jenkins and Cox state that because garments are considered ‘useful articles’ by the courts, they are not protected by copyright. There is a similar situation in the UK; while designers have some protection through design right, in practice no-one can own elements like a sleeve shape or a striking silhouette.

Effectively, as Cox and Jenkins say, ‘designers are free to borrow, imitate, recombine, transform and share design elements’. New designs are built on archetypes and previous styles; appropriation and modification are inherent to the fashion design process and entirely legal. This is a striking contrast with the worlds of music, literature and film – at the workshop we heard many examples of how the sampling or remixing of existing content can breach copyright law.

The downside of this lack of protection is the copying which is common practice in high street fashion. I have had my own knitwear designs ripped off by a number of retailers, and found it to be a distressing experience. Although I was successful in gaining recompense in the most extreme case, as I had formally registered my design, most designers know that if you make a few tweaks to a copy then it is very difficult to argue legally. So, I’m a defender of the fashion commons, but complain about copying – isn’t that a contradiction?

I don’t think so – for me, there is a definite difference between remixing and copying. Copying is cynical, lazy and a waste of the talents of the designers our art colleges train every year. Remixing connects us with each other by reviving and recombining things that we recognise, in a new cultural context.

Cox and Jenkins suggest that fashion’s intellectual property regime could provide a model for other sectors. Although I’m no expert, I think I agree. The ‘big picture’ argument for copyright protection is that it enriches the commons, and ensures that creators are sufficiently rewarded to keep creating new content. However, the stories from film, music and literature suggest that the commons are being denied lots of new, remixed material. James Boyle argues that information products are made of fragments of other information, and the increase of protection reduces the supply of these fragments: a cultural ‘Tragedy of the Anticommons’.

Putting these weighty thoughts to one side, I’ll finish by thinking more specifically about the Digital Transformations project, which is (like me) interested in communities of amateur enthusiasts producing innovative material. My particular focus is on amateurs making, and re-making, their own clothing. Just like professional designers, amateur designer-makers can ‘remix’ the fashion commons. Even makers using patterns, which might seem to be prescriptive, can make their own combination of design elements. Patterns are often designed to allow users to choose from various options and features, and makers also branch out to create adaptations not suggested by the pattern, gathering inspiration from all over the place: films, high street shops, catwalks, vintage clothes, street style and so on.

In writing this post, I was reflecting on the other key aspect of the project: the traditional cultural organisations which are starting to engage with amateur producers. I realised that there are very few cultural organisations focusing on fashion and dress; off the top of my head, I can only think of the V&A and the Fashion and Textile Museum. These are isolated examples of institutions that have an interest in encouraging amateur communities to produce their own fashion; most of this activity is carried out by individual designer-makers, like me.

We are far outnumbered by the corporate entities which design, manufacture, sell and promote fashion – all of whom have a vested interest in keeping us as passive consumers. So, although fashion may have a relaxed approach to intellectual property, which could be rewardingly explored by amateur producers, there are few organisations around encouraging anyone to do so.

Category:

Pages